Text Size   Decrease Font SizeIncrease Font Size

Not In My Backyard - Abutters and Zoning Decisions


Recent decisions in Massachusetts courts have tightened the requirements for challenging a zoning decision. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

found that in order to challenge a zoning decision, the adverse effect on the plaintiff of the zoning decision must be substantial enough so that there is no question that the plaintiff was actually harmed by the decision. By tightening the requirements, the court has limited zoning appeals to plaintiffs who are objectively harmed in an effort to reduce cases based solely on the premise, 'not in my backyard'.

Massachusetts law provides that, "any person aggrieved by a decision of the board of appeals or any special permit granting authority........ ......may appeal within twenty days after the decision has been filed in the office of the city or town clerk." An abutter reading this section would assume that if they appealed a decision of the Board of Appeals or Special Permit Granting Authority within twenty days, their appeal would be heard by the Court. Unfortunately for the abutter, it is not this straight forward. The courts in Massachusetts, as well as many other jurisdictions, have spent considerable resources litigating the meaning of the third word in the statute, "aggrieved". As a result, many courts do not even reached the merits of a claim regarding the decision of the Board of Appeals or Special Permit Granting Authority as the abutter fails to establish the pre-requisite 'standing' to bring their appeal.

An abutter in Massachusetts has a rebuttable presumption of 'standing', however, once the other party challenges the abutters' standing, the burden of proof shifts to the abutter to prove that they have been harmed by a decision of the board of appeals or special permit granting authority. To prove standing, an abutter must prove that the decision of the board of appeals or special permit granting authority will result in an injury to the abutter of a specific interest that the statute, ordinance or bylaw at issue intends to protect. The sufficiency of the injury and whether the injury is to a protected interest has been well litigated in Massachusetts.

If you receive notice of a hearing on a special permit or an appeal of a zoning decision, you are most likely an abutter and may have rights which need protection. Our firm can help you navigate the process at the town level and within the Massachusetts' court system.


Recent Updates

New Power for Condominium Associations to Collect Unpaid Condominium Fees

On March 29, 2016, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued an important decision for Condominium Associations. In the Drummer Boy Association, Inc. v. Britton case, the Court has ruled that ...

Read More

Protecting Condominium Associations - Collecting Unpaid Fees

The Appeals Court of Massachusetts recently restricted the 'super lien' of condominium associations over first mortgage holders for unpaid condo fees to the six months immediately preceding the filing of ...

Read More


“Lori, I made these bracelets as an artistic outlet, but also as an exercise in focus and concentration. Please accept these tokens of my great appreciation for all the time and trouble you have taken on my behalf. Thank you so much!”


“Attorney Favata – Lori, You may not realize what a gift you are to others but I know first hand what a difference you’ve made in R.S.’s life ~ a difference that will impact him every day for the rest of his life.”

Contact Us

map flood

Law Offices of Flood & Favata
14 Winthrop Street
Marlborough, MA 01752
Tel: 508-624-4700
Fax: 508-624-7497
E-mail: attorneys@floodlaw.net

fb_icon Find us on Facebook

©2014 Law Offices of Flood & Favata


Website Design by The Modern Firm